I think this is ready to go! There are three items that could be controversial:

1. The Selection Modal that pops up in the Identify View is a .sheet. I can change this to a full Stinsen > Router but I thought this was easier solution opposed to passing the viewModel between views. I'd be happy to move that over but I felt the sheet made sense on my end so I would go into the review with my current route.

2. I am only searching on selection of the Search button. Since this is pinging the server each time and the server is pinging providers, I was worried there might be a rate limiting concern if you have a long search string and this performs the search with each new letter. Pinging just Jellyfin, I don't see a problem automatically searching but I'd rather not cause issues with providers and potentially getting someone rate limited.

3. I standardized the Cancel button from the VideoPlayerView. I hope this is the route we want this to look for other instances of this type of loading/cancelling:

Other than that, I believe this is ready to go! Please let me know if there are any changes or feedback that should be taken into account!

Apologies for not responding earlier for some feedback. Instead of just commenting and waiting I've just updated with some of my changes, most notably by renaming and some redesign using other existing views.

Per the implementation of a unified cancel view like the video player, that view and flow is changed in my work in #1203. Something like that should be in DelayedProgressView, but even then that view probably isn't the best here.

There are many changes that this flow should receive though:

* Change poster styling depending on media type. This will be more important when music is implemented.

* `ItemView` and all subsidiary views are way old, before I knew what I know now about about proper ways to update views in SwiftUI. They will need some refactoring to handle item updates, which is why I changed a bit in `ItemView.AboutView` to accommodate item updating but even that should be changed.

* We need to figure out cache invalidation for the previous item images.

What's here is good for now!

This looks great! Thank you again for helping get this over the finish line. These changes all make sense and I'm very happy with the result!